|
|
Post by Miriamele on Jan 15, 2008 20:08:44 GMT -5
Wow, my head hurts after reading all this, but I have to say I'm all for just leaving inactive card and moving up. I kind of like the number system because it's a legacy. We see all the members that have been around. Sure, I may not be able to get those coveted cards I've PM'd people for in the past, but it's still really cool to see how many members we have had and what their interests are! it's kind neat!
So I'm all for just saying if #5 goes hiatus, just leave them be and move on. Sure it means there will be a lot of cards but it will still be nifty. And of course 20 cards = 1 set, etc.
Maybe I'm off about it. Really I don't care either way, but I think it'd be cool just to move on and not take away cards from those who have gone, just because it's fun to have buttloads of cards. So umm.. Holla Nash and Mousey? What they said. *nods* Yeah.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mousey on Jan 16, 2008 1:16:22 GMT -5
Yay, supporters-ish! XD
I'm glad that most everyone is on the same page for the 20 cards = 1 mastery movement, though. Even though I've been with SCMR since the start, I'm fairly sure I've only mastered 2 of the 3 full sets. (I honestly quit keeping track because it's so freaking difficult.)
|
|
jenbunny
Super Trader
Shy Little Bunny Looking for Sugars!
Posts: 1,237
|
Post by jenbunny on Jan 16, 2008 11:50:25 GMT -5
I like the idea of every time you get 20 new member cards you master ^^
|
|
Starr
Eternal Trader
I'm dreaming, you're awake
Posts: 1,740
|
Post by Starr on Jan 16, 2008 16:27:59 GMT -5
I kind of like the number system because it's a legacy. We see all the members that have been around. Sure, I may not be able to get those coveted cards I've PM'd people for in the past, but it's still really cool to see how many members we have had and what their interests are! it's kind neat! Well, we could also have a system where we kept numbers, but didn't have specific sets... but whomever (whoever? I always get those mixed up) would remake the cards could number the cards in the relative order that people joined. (Like... Calico would stay #1 and the 2nd joined member would be #2 and so on, assuming you all have the join forms archived.) So then, after the last number of all of the current members, the numbers would keep going in the order that new members apply for member cards. This way, we can have simpler masteries *and* keep the nostalgia intact! |
|
|
|
Post by Britti on Jan 16, 2008 16:48:48 GMT -5
I kind of like the number system because it's a legacy. We see all the members that have been around. Sure, I may not be able to get those coveted cards I've PM'd people for in the past, but it's still really cool to see how many members we have had and what their interests are! it's kind neat! Well, we could also have a system where we kept numbers, but didn't have specific sets... but whomever (whoever? I always get those mixed up) would remake the cards could number the cards in the relative order that people joined. (Like... Calico would stay #1 and the 2nd joined member would be #2 and so on, assuming you all have the join forms archived.) So then, after the last number of all of the current members, the numbers would keep going in the order that new members apply for member cards. This way, we can have simpler masteries *and* keep the nostalgia intact! Sadly, that is way too much effort with no real... Purpose. Yeah, it'd be nice, but most people seem to be fond of 20 cards = 1 mastery. :3 Plus, that would make everyone redo their member cards. Numbers will probably stay the same in other words, once these last 3 holes are full and we'll keep building instead. ^^;; More than likely, anyway. |
|
Tanakil
Star Trader
That's. One. Smart. Cookie.
Posts: 499
|
Post by Tanakil on Jan 16, 2008 16:50:15 GMT -5
Let me know if there is an official annoucement about the change, so I can get a level up or two  |
|
indigo
Regular Trader
Posts: 183
|
Post by indigo on Jan 16, 2008 16:52:28 GMT -5
I'd LOVE a new system like this, I vote yes. |
|
|
|
Post by Mousey on Jan 16, 2008 17:26:34 GMT -5
Let me know if there is an official annoucement about the change, so I can get a level up or two Well, actually, member sets don't count towards level-up masteries. o3o |
|
|
|
Post by Rissa on Jan 17, 2008 21:08:23 GMT -5
I really do like the idea of just counting on.. Instead of replacing numbers.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mousey on Jan 18, 2008 1:40:05 GMT -5
Given that so many members have replied (16 might not seem like a lot but lulz I have a sneaking suspicion that it's the best we're going to get!), an announcement will be made regarding the member card system during this weekend's routine update. <3
In the mean time, keep on discussing things! XD
|
|
|
|
Post by Mousey on Jan 19, 2008 23:55:40 GMT -5
Update:
The new system has been introduced! Please see the updates for info. ^_^
|
|
SuperDoe
Crisis Trader
You people and your slight differences disgust me!
Posts: 712
|
Post by SuperDoe on Jan 20, 2008 0:06:19 GMT -5
I really like the new system. will we be keeping the numbers or getting rid of them because they have no purpose anymore... (and not having them/beign able to have them in order will really bug me. XD )
|
|
|
|
Post by Mousey on Jan 20, 2008 0:14:54 GMT -5
The numbers are staying, haha. Mainly out of convenience for everyone, so I don't have to remake them and you guys don't have to re-upload. XD
|
|
